United States District Court

Very cool looking old building
Aug 14th, 2020

Judicial officers here will fabricate legal arguments and try to stiff you based on knowingly false legal arguments. For example, a Magistrate Judge in this court recommended dismissal based on the contention that Judges are absolutely immune from suit; however, the Sixth Circuit in Ward v. City of Norwalk held that judges can be sued for declaratory and injunctive relief under 42 USC 1983 (which is all a requested). This court also applies the outdated inextricably intertwined standard of of the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine, despite the fact that “In Exxon, the Supreme Court implicitly repudiated the circuits' post-Feldman use of the phrase "inextricably intertwined" to extend Rooker-Feldman to situations [where] the source of the injury was not the state court judgment…” [Kovacic v. CUYAHOGA CTY. DEP'T OF CHILDREN & FAM., 606 F. 3d 301 - Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit 2010] “The Sixth Circuit also repudiated the "inextricably intertwined" test used by the lower courts prior to the Exxon Mobil decision, finding that standard was no longer viable” [In re Durham, 493 BR 506 - Bankr. Court, SD Ohio 2013]. Be careful with these judges because they will mis-quote the law, use outdated or defunct cases, and generally even use cases which are no longer valid as a means to dismiss your case. I am not a lawyer and nothing in this post and nothing that I write should be construed as legal advice or legal argument. Everything in this post is merely a representation of my lay opinion.
Jul 5th, 2019

Mar 30th, 2019

Feb 6th, 2019

Sep 19th, 2018